Democrats won't accept illegitimate acquittal of fake president elected illegally

“Donald Trump’s impeachment acquittal will be meaningless because we never accepted the results of the 2016 election in the first place,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., declared Friday. “Anyone who accepts an acquittal is a danger to our democracy.”

“The House proved Trump’s guilt before this sham trial in the Senate started,” Schumer added. “But Republicans still didn’t allow Senators to present witnesses or documents to convict him, which is just more evidence that our Constitution is under attack.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also said she won’t accept a not guilty verdict in the Senate as vindication.

“He will not be acquitted,” Pelosi said. “You cannot be acquitted if you’re already guilty before the trial starts, and you don’t have a trial if you don’t have witnesses and documentation.”

Kamala Harris, a former California Attorney General and White House hopeful, said the illegal president’s lawyers “disgraced themselves terribly in terms of their violation of what our Constitution is about.”

“There will be no true acquittal if there is no fair trial,” Harris added. “Republicans are trying to dismantle the Constitution to keep an illegitimate president on the ballot in 2020, and we won’t accept the results of that election unless a Democrat wins.”

Hillary Clinton said the Founding Fathers never imagined Congress would have to impeach an illegal president.

“This is exactly what our Founders feared,” Clinton said. “A fake president who thinks any action is justified if he says it’s good for the country — including paying a foreign government for dirt on his political opponent and using our domestic intelligence agencies to impact an American election.”

8 thoughts on “Democrats won't accept illegitimate acquittal of fake president elected illegally

  1. W that happened to innocent tile proven guilty? THEY HAVE NOT PROVED ANYTHING! EXCEPT THAT They think that they are above the law

    Like

  2. Yup! And why would they even bother with witnesses and evidence unless they knew he was guilty. And since they know he’s guilty why should they waste time with witnesses and evidence? The Senate was constitutionally required to convict,and if not, what good is the constitution. I say impeach them all, starting with the Founders. Or the Pilgrims or Columbus.

    Like

  3. What evidence of what crime? Schiff admitted he wrote a parody of what he THOUGHT the president meant by the phone call. It was not what was actually said. President Trump will be acquitted and he will still be your President. 😂🤣😂

    Like

  4. First they said Trump delayed giving the money, now Clinton says he is guilty of paying for dirt on a political rival. If Bidon is guilty of crimes he SHOULD be investigated, political rival or not.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.